Judge in California rejects the 'will of the people'!...

When the ‘proposal 8’ was recently overturned in California, it shows that even democracy isn’t allowed when bias has a bias. This judge has opened up a ‘Pandora’s box’ that will surely haunt his decision.

Is his statement summary it was so noted that, “to marry the person of one's choice is a fundamental right”.. Really now..? .. ‘a fundamental right to choose a partner’..hmmm…

Why stop at homosexuals and lesbians?
It would be discrimination not to allow bi-sexuals..they should be able to have at least 3 in a marriage.. and why stop at three, four, five or be limited to a number?

What about human and animal relationships? Surely the judge allowing people to choose partners can’t mean that a 55 year old man shouldn’t be able to choose a 5 year old boy and girl and a dog as his partners? Sadly the absurdity can be substituted in all his points of ruling. His logic is anything but…

Neither can he claim scientific reasoning, because science puts an end to his theory. Both science and once again the Church are correct; that marriage by definition is between a male and female and these are the necessary natural ingredients required for a family. He should look at the guidelines that nature, has naturally provided; and remember that laws are formed as a set of norms to halt the obscene.

May this ‘Pandora’s box’ be reversed!